In the last few weeks, the rumor mill has been busy. We hear myriad dispatches from "rumor central' about pending disclosure of government UFO secrets, impending Armageddon, open contact, chemtrails, global warming (and global warming not existing). It is fascinating to be an observer to the traffic on a number of e-mail lists - UFO, New-Age, Christian, political (right wing, left wing and the radical middle), etc., etc., etc...
One of the biggest surges of e-mails have been dispatches from contactees. Teachings of the Pleiadeans/Pleijarans, channeling from the Galactic Federation, apocalyptic scenarios left over from abduction encounters, etc. All seem to have the same theme - the crossroads has arrived. The theme is consistent; the lesson is the same. Yet in each case, the details are very different.
In a number of regressions I've done with experiencers, they have made predictions based upon information "the aliens told me". In each case, the central theme, whatever it might be, is very valid. There is a lesson to be learned in nearly every case. However, the details are nearly always wrong.
I have had several experiencers tell me while they were in deep trance, that they knew something was about to happen, a sighting, an encounter, a political or scientific occurrence, or some other event that could potentially be confirmable. Frequently, it's a prediction of some kind of contact. And in each case, the event did not occur.
A few years ago, a group of us on the New Civilization Network (http://www.newciv.org/) had a virtual room set up, the PSI room. In the PSI room, we had several years worth of round-robin remote viewing experiments. Over time, I noticed a pattern emerge - the generalities tended to be pretty accurate. We got pretty good at getting the general picture, observations - the emotions, impressions, sensations, etc. - all tended to be spot on. However, once we got into any kind of interpretation, or detailed predictions of what the scene was, we were pretty far off. It seems to work if one just sticks to the impressions and observations. When one starts getting analytical, the local mind replaces the non local and the channel shuts down. (or as skeptics would say, generalities are easy, specifics are-tough).
The most recent, very spectacular case of channeled predictions is that of Blossom Goodchild, the Australian Psychic who predicted that the Visitors would openly arrive in the skies over Alabama. It never happened.
Now on several e-mail lists, we hear channeled messages that disclosure is imminent. just like the aliens in the Alabama skies, we hear that very soon now (perhaps before the end of the year) President Obama is going to make a public announcement that the Visitors are real, and they are here. Will it happen? I certainly don't know - I'm not privy to the inner circles of the president's cabinet. However, I don't think I'll hold my breath.
On numerous occasions, I and other researchers have written speculative articles about how, in the grand phenomenal scheme of things, the government doesn't matter much. The Visitors will do what they do, regardless of what the government does. How does this make the government look? Certainly not very powerful. The result has been fear, a frantic effort to understand these Visitors from the sky. They may have a lot of data, but I doubt if there has been much understanding.
Steven Greer and other disclosure advocates have long been advocating a "come clean" philosophy, that government should simply put all their cards on the table. What would happen if they did? I suppose that depends upon what those cards are - cards that may or may not have fallen from the sky. Would it cause the collapse of society? I doubt it - unless, that is, the cards say something dark and sinister - something like "aliens have infiltrated every part of our society and are bent on taking over Earth." But again, I doubt that's the real picture.
I often wonder if such channelings are a reflection of the aggregate field consciousness of humanity. The details may be superfluous. The important part is the underlying theme, the Jungian archetype that is the foundation of the message. In the case of the Visitor arrival predictions, the archetype is simple - the desire to see positive, benevolent beings arrive from elsewhere. In the case of disclosure, again the overall theme is quite apparent - the desire to know the truth. Perhaps the details are not as important as the expression of the desire to understand, once and for all, what our authority structures's role is in the Visitors' interaction with humanity. Thus, the message I take away from the increase in 'disclosure is imminent' messages is the crescendo of desire to know the truth - whatever it is.
So in the end we are back to the channeled predictions. Are we going to have disclosure in the near future? Is President Obama going to go on Prime Time TV and announce that the Visitors have arrived? If it happened, I would be pleasantly and profoundly surprised. But my bet is that the year will end, and next year will play out, with no official announcement. There will probably be no spectacular disclosure. There might be sighting info, investigations and Bluebook or other reports, etc., posted online, as the Canadian government apparently did earlier this year. But I won't expect to see too many alien ships appear in the Alabama skies, nor to hear an announcement on UFOs from President Obama.
When it comes to the question of coverup vs disclosure, I don't know what really goes on behind the curtain, but I predict that tomorrow will be pretty much the same as today.
